Cumberland ATV Riders

ATV's & UTV's & Proud Supporters of our Troops!
HomeCalendarSearchRegisterLog in
Latest topics
» 30x10x14 Monster Mayhems for sale
Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:58 am by Grogan73

» For Sale: Factory 2018 RZR 900 4 tires
Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:19 pm by Grogan73

» Bledsoe State Forest Riding--Anyone Been?
Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:09 am by dkoogler

» Big Bottom Unit TWRA
Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:22 pm by dkoogler

» Mobile Two-Way Radio
Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:27 pm by ranger tim

» Any one ever ride Franklin State Park or Natural area TN
Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:14 pm by tosha20

» Tackett Creek?
Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:03 pm by bigcat

» Skyline WMA
Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:42 pm by pwm

» 2010 Polaris Ranger 800XP $8000.00 SOLD
Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:13 pm by ranger tim

Similar topics

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search

Atv Trail Tunes

Four Wheelin Expeditions


June 2018
Hit Counter
hit counters

Share | 

 Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?

Go down 

Joined : 2008-01-15
Posts : 10992
Age : 54
Location : Knoxville, TN

PostSubject: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:39 pm

By: Robert Janis

People involved in ATV recreation rely on access to public lands to do their riding or get to where they wish to ride. Many excellent trails are located in public land areas which are managed by the U.S. Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management. For the most part, recreationists and the government have achieved a balance as the federal government tolerates the use of ATVs and other motorized off-road vehicles on the land they manage. But something is going on with the Department of Interior--more specifically with the Secretary of Interior, Ken Salazar, and it is getting many OHV recreational advocates worried.

One of those who feel that the community should watch out is Brian Hawthorne of the BlueRibbon Coalition. In an article in the BlueRibbon Coalition newsletter, Hawthorne noted that Salazar has been circulating a “secret memo” detailing a new vision for the Bureau of Land Management. The document is titled “Our Vision--Our Values” which muses about a different policy through which the BLM can manage public lands under its authority.

Hawthorne argues that the “Vision” would change BLM’s current policy of multiple use and sustained yield and instead adopt a much more preservationis- oriented type of management. The policy, if accepted, would allow areas currently in the National Landscape Conservation System--National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Areas, Outstanding Natural Areas, Wild and Scenic Rivers, National Scenic and Historic Trails, and Conservation Lands within the California desert--to be “confiscated” from public use and given a “protective designation.” In other words, if areas that include an OHV trail system are adjacent to a National Landscape Conservation System, then that land could be closed from use by OHV riders.

The plan would be based on three principles--Designate, Rationalize, and Manage-at-Scale.

Designate refers to adding more lands to the National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS) for “protection.” Rationalize refers to what the “Vision” document claims will be a more efficient and effective landscape-scale management of the territory that is under the control of BLM. The rationalize aspect of the policy would eliminate the existence of so-called checkerboard land holding patterns. In other words, the federal government would buy private lands within or adjacent to NLCS lands. Finally, Hawthorne said that the third principle, Manage-to-Scale, is where Salazar’s staff shows the intent to abandon multiple-use management. “The Manage-to-scale section of the Vision document includes direction to put preservation-oriented values first, before recreation or any other use,” Hawthorne said. This would mean that BLM would manage all of their lands in a manner that would focus on ecosystem-service values.

Hawthorne points out that when Salazar started musing about this plan and passing a memo on it to the internal staff of the Department of Interior, the idea was supposed to be private and not for public release. The memo found its way to the Internet and someone discovered it. “It was an internal draft not for release, a discussion paper for the staff of the Bureau of Land Management,” said Hawthorne.

“No one was paying attention. However, someone found it, read a section of the document, and then leaked it.”

Hawthorne said that minority members of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Resource Committee read the section of the memo that was leaked and demanded that Interior Secretary Salazar release the whole memo.

Salazar said that the memo was a draft and that there was no “immediate” plans to act upon it. He referred to it as just “brainstorming” and then he released the entire memo.

Obviously, a controversy started and since then Salazar has drafted an answer which has been released by the Public Affairs Department of the Department of Interior in response to media questions concerning the issue.

The release reads:

“Secretary Salazar believes it is important that the Department of Interior serve as wise stewards of the places that matter most to Americans. For that reason, he has asked Department of Interior’s bureaus to think about what areas might be worth considering for further review for possible special management of Congressional designation. The preliminary internal discussion draft reflects some brainstorming discussions within BLM, but no decisions have been made about which areas, if any, might merit more serious review and consideration.

Secretary Salazar believes new designations and conservation initiatives work best when they build on local efforts to better manage places that are important to nearby communities. In the past months, Secretary Salazar and administration officials have held listening sessions across the country as part of President Obama’s America’s Great Outdoors Initiative. To date, there have been over 20 forums, including youth listening sessions, where members of the public have participated in the national dialogue about conservation and reconnecting Americans to the outdoors. Secretary Salazar will continue to listen, learn, and seek common-sense ways to support the good work that is happening in communities across the country. “

Hawthorne pointed out that the Department of Interior and the Bureau of Land Management must follow specific instructions of laws passed by the Congress on this issue. “The key component of the law is called Multiple-Use Mandate and the Salazar memo, if implemented, would circumvent that,” he said.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that basically the administration can do what it wants unless stopped by Congress. Due to the Separation of Powers the courts can do nothing. If there is an abuse, then Congress must take action to stop it.

And Congress is doing something. There is legislation pending in the U.S. House of Representatives--H.R. 5580--called the National Monument Designation Transparency & Accountability Act. The legislation would help to limit the amount of land that could be designated as a National Monument, and it will prevent arbitrary restrictions on various multiple-use activities including vehicle-based recreation and access to public lands. The BlueRibbon Coalition supports the legislation, added Hawthorne.

However, he warned local ATV riders and clubs to be vigilant in their own regions. All politics is local, and he asserted that this is actually a local issue. “Local OHV clubs and the grass roots need to be aware and vigilant to prevent any type of land grab on the principles of the Our Vision--Our Values memo,” he said. Although he said that the principles set down in the memo probably will not become federal DOI or BLM policy, little by little the staff in the local offices could implement it incrementally, he said.

He said that local clubs need to track the actions of the local BLM and then use their long-term relationships with the local BLM office to resist it. Hawthorne encouraged local clubs and the grass roots to seek counseling from BlueRibbon Coalition. “BlueRibbon can help with federal land issues and turn you in the right direction when it is state lands that are at issue. But it is the active club members being involved that can save the land for motorized recreation,” said Hawthorne.

“Be active in the political process. Know who your senators and congressmen are by name and remember, it is the local guy that starts the legal action,” he concluded.

2010 Ranger XP 800
PP Windshield F&B, EMP EXT Bumper, Warn 40XT, Kobalt Box, Backwoods Armor 2" Lift/Arched Forward A-Arms, ProArmor Doors, DJ Fab Heat Shield, KFI Front Hitch, UTV Tech Mud Guard & Grill Insert, Crow 4-point Harness, Hi Lift Jack, 27" Horns, SS108's, Garmin 76csx, IPOD 80GB w/Otter Box, ATV Trail Tunes Sounds, Dual Battery Setup,  2-way Radio, PWM Built Spare Tire/Gas Carrier, Diamond Back Top & Floor Mats, HID's, FlexSteel Seats

PWM's Pix

Back to top Go down
Senior Member

Joined : 2008-08-24
Posts : 754
Age : 75
Location : On a hill, Clinton, TN

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:52 pm

WE got to get rid of this administration next election...

The lands are publicly owned... the government is only the caretaker. If we don't like what the caretaker is doing, we got to FIRE them...
Back to top Go down
CATVR Junkie

Joined : 2008-12-30
Posts : 2323
Location : Chattavegas

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:55 pm

Thats alot to digest ,

Aside from this general article -----

my feelings in all these years of roaming the USA is U.S. Forest Service mostly sux and BLM goes either way , sometimes really good though .
BLM has allowed us rockclimbers to have way more freedom than the forest service has .
Just my 2 cents
Back to top Go down
Senior Member

Joined : 2008-01-15
Posts : 896
Age : 54
Location : Charleston Tn

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:20 am

We live 10 miles from the Cherokee National Forest. Up till about 20 yaers ago you could ride there if it be in a Jeep or any motorized vehicle. They stopped when they done their use plans. I'd like to see them change it myself.
Back to top Go down
Senior Member

Joined : 2008-02-04
Posts : 563
Age : 44
Location : K-TOWN-TN

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:38 am

Neverending. Dead Horse

I agree with Dan. We have got to get these people out of there, and like the article says we have got to stay vigilent at the local level. We could sure lose some fantastic areas if we dont.
Back to top Go down
CATVR Junkie

Joined : 2008-12-30
Posts : 2323
Location : Chattavegas

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:56 am

Its why the Cove is an unprotected area - People are scrared to protect it .
Once some Gov entity becomes involved poof Its closed .
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content

PostSubject: Re: Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?   

Back to top Go down
Is the Department of Interior Planning a Land Grab?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Public land in WA
» Active organizations fighting for your right to ride Public Land
» Help get out of state prices lowered for WMA land!!!
» Aberavon Car PArk
» Interior Jerry Can Mount

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Cumberland ATV Riders :: General :: ATV News-
Jump to:  
Create a forum | © phpBB | Free forum support | Report an abuse | Free forum